J Street's onslaught is fairly typical of the hysterical responses. It reads:
"J Street condemns the Knesset's passage yesterday of a law making the call for boycotts of Israel or the West Bank settlements illegal, as a clear and unabashed violation of the fundamental democratic precept of freedom of speech.
"This bill is part of a disturbing anti-democratic trend that undermines its purported purpose by giving fodder to Israel's critics and alienating many of its friends.
"In direct contradiction to claims that it would somehow protect Israel from efforts to delegitimize it, the boycott bill actually gives ammunition to those who question Israel's democratic standing. While J Street opposes the BDS movement, we are concerned that criminalizing it will only be used as further justification for increasing anti-Israel boycotts." (My emphasis)
Like with many of the statements and headlines on this new law, J Street's statement is a total mischaracterization of the law. It states that the new law "criminalizes" calling for a boycott. This is a gross mistatement. U.S. law makes it a crime punishable by up to five years in prison and a penalty of $50,000 or five times damages, whichever is greater, to promote or engage in a boycott of Israel. Companies can also lose their right to export.
In contrast, the new Israeli law is a civil statute that creates a new tort. It gives the right to sue to someone who alleges damages from a call to boycott or compliance with the boycott against the person who alledgedly caused the damages. It also prohibits companies that start or comply with boycotts from doing business with the Israeli government. It "criminalizes" nothing and makes nothing "illegal."
The Israeli Attorney General has expressed his doubts about the law. He said he will defend it but indicated it will not be a particularly robust defense.
I do not like the law. I think there are better ways to fight the boycott. Nevertheless, it is not the end of democracy in Israel. It is not even the beginning of the end. Indeed, the entire debate about the law, the fact that it was substantially amended, and the fact that the Supreme Court might very well invalidate it are pretty good evidence that Israel's democracy is vibrant.
Both the right and the left here in Israel are using the law for their own purposes. (Surprise: Israeli politicians are just like those in other countries.) The fact that anti-Israel folks are making a big deal out of the law is no surprise and probably is a good reason it should not have been passed. The fact that a lot of American Jews are seeing it as some huge catastrophe and the downfall of Israeli democracy shows that they either have not read it, are super-sensitive and defensive, and/or are looking for things to criticize Israel about.
Unfortunately, by the time these kinds of issues are adequately understood or get defeated or are otherwise neutered, the organizations are on to the next crisis de jure and the damage done to Israel with the Jewish and general public is irreparable. It is a wonder why these kinds of issues so upset many American Jewish organizations and their members, particularly those that lean left, while issues related to Israel's very survival and the safety of its citizens are often treated in a nonchalant, even cavalier manner.
Better they should get a little upset about Iranian nuclear development and President Abbas' continuing refusal to negotiate unless his objectives are agreed to before sitting down at the table.
spot on, very well articulated...ReplyDelete
I was not surprised at your response to J Street. But swinging out to the right of Abe Foxman? Wow!
US State Dept. issues muted criticism of Boycott Law
By JPOST.COM STAFF AND GIL SHEFLER
Washington says law an internal Israeli matter, reaffirms freedom of expression, protest are tenets of democracy; ADL praises US statement.
The United States State Department put out a mild condemnation of Israel's new Boycott Law on Tuesday, deferring a direct reaction saying it was an internal Israeli matter.
However, the Department of State reaffirmed that freedom of expression and the right to protest and organize are basics right under democracy.
Anti-Defamation League director Abraham Foxman called the statement from Washington, "sufficient," adding, "they said they didn't think this law was good in the spirit of democracy," speaking with Army Radio.
His criticism of the Boycott Law, however, was more pointed. The law, he said, is "unnecessary legislation, which will only do damage to the democratic State of Israel."
"It's a sad day for Israeli democracy," Foxman told Army Radio.
In an earlier statement, Foxman said that while he opposes all boycotts of Israel, the law concerns him as an infringement on democratic freedoms in Israel.
"The Anti-Defamation League has a long history of vigorous opposition to any and all boycotts of Israel, and works every day to expose and combat those who seek to cause damage to the Jewish state," Abraham Foxman, ADL National Director said. "We are, however, concerned that this law may unduly impinge on the basic democratic rights of Israelis to freedom of speech and freedom of expression."
Foxman said he hoped "Israel’s Supreme Court will quickly take up a review of this law and resolve the concerns it raises."